ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC EXPERIENCES ON THE FORMATION OF CLINICAL THINKING IN MEDICAL SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
clinical thinking, international experience, Case-Based Learning (CBL), Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Early Clinical Exposure, Script Concordance Test (SCT), simulation training, bedside training, reflective writing, think-aloud analysis, clinical competency-based teaching, medical school, modernization of medical education.Abstract
The article compares the methods, curricula and pedagogical approaches used in the formation of clinical thinking in the world's leading medical schools - such as the USA, Canada, Great Britain, Australia, Japan and Singapore - based on scientific sources. The article compares the effectiveness of Case-Based Learning, Problem-Based Learning, Early Clinical Exposure, Script Concordance Test, simulation, bedside training, reflexive writing and think-aloud analysis methods used in different educational systems. As a general conclusion of foreign experience, the article shows that global pedagogical approaches, innovative methods and clinical competency-based teaching models are highly effective in modernizing the process of forming clinical thinking at the medical technical school stage. These generalized international practices serve as a theoretical basis for developing methodological solutions for medical technical schools in Uzbekistan.
References
1.Ibodullayev, Z. (2008). Tibbiyot psixologiyasi . Toshkent: Iqtisod-Moliya.
2.Lalov, Yu. V., & Osadchuk, O. L. (2016). Formation of professional thinking in future doctors through the case-based teaching method. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research , (2–2), 302–305.
3.Rakhmatullaev, H. H. (2019). Development of clinical thinking of medical students in the context of a competency-based approach. Pedagogical Education and Science , (5), 112–116.
4.Thistlethwaite, J. E., Davies, D., Ekeocha, S., Kidd, J. M., MacDougall, C., Matthews, P., Purkis, J., & Clay, D. (2012). The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 34(6), e421–e444.
5.Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
6.Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic.
7.Charlin, B., Tardif, J., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2000). Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: Theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Academic Medicine, 75(2), 182–190.
8.Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
