ETYMOLOGICAL AND LEXICAL ANALYSIS OF “COURAGE”
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article investigates the etymological development and lexical characteristics of the English word courage. The study aims to trace its historical origins, semantic changes, and lexical relationships within the English language. Using historical dictionaries and semantic analysis, the research reveals that courage originated from the Latin cor meaning “heart,” later evolving through Old French and Middle English to its present-day meaning of “mental or moral strength to face danger or fear.” The article concludes that courage reflects not only a linguistic evolution but also a transformation of cultural and moral values from physical bravery to spiritual and ethical strength.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Aristotle. (2004). Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. by J. A. K. Thomson. Penguin Classics.
2.Davydova T. A. Language and Psyche. – Moscow: Slavic Culture Languages, 2005. – p. 37.
3.Harper, D. (2024). Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.etymonline.com
4.Karasik V. I. Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse. – Volgograd: Peremena, 2002. – p. 10.
5.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
6.Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2024). Courage.
7.Oxford English Dictionary. (2024). Courage. Oxford University Press.
8.Pavlenko A. Language and Emotion. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. – p. 25.
9.Popov V. F. Associations and Their Linguistic Analysis. – Moscow: Nauka, 1998. – p. 50.
10.