THE PLACE OF THE MODESTY MAXIM AMONG OTHER POLITENESS MAXIMS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The concept of politeness occupies a central position in pragmatic and sociolinguistic studies, serving as a key mechanism through which social harmony and interpersonal relations are maintained. Among various theoretical models, Geoffrey Leech’s Politeness Principle and its associated maxims have played a significant role in explaining how speakers manage social interaction through language. This article focuses on the modesty maxim, examining its place, function, and interaction with other politeness maxims such as tact, generosity, approbation, agreement, and sympathy. Through theoretical analysis and illustrative examples, the study argues that the modesty maxim functions as a mediating and identity-regulating principle that balances self-presentation and social expectations. The paper further demonstrates that while the modesty maxim is closely interconnected with other maxims, it possesses distinctive pragmatic and cultural significance, particularly in collectivist societies. The analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of politeness as a dynamic and context-dependent phenomenon rather than a fixed set of universal rules.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
2.Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge.
3.Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. Longman.
4.Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.
5.Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
6.Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Blackwell.
7.Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. Ballantine Books.