HUMOUR AS A STYLISTIC AND PRAGMATIC DEVICE IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LITERATURE

Main Article Content

Adizova Madina Komilovna

Abstract

This article explores humour as a culturally mediated stylistic and pragmatic phenomenon through a comparative analysis of English and Uzbek literary texts. Drawing on linguistic theories of humour and pragmatic approaches to meaning construction, the study examines how humorous effects are generated through irony, satire, exaggeration, and narrative incongruity. A qualitative comparative methodology is applied to selected canonical novels and short prose from both literary traditions. The analysis reveals that, despite shared narrative functions such as character construction and reader engagement, humour in English literature tends to operate through indirect evaluation and pragmatic inference, whereas Uzbek literary humour more frequently foregrounds explicit social critique and culturally grounded moral reflection. These findings contribute to comparative literary stylistics and underline the role of humour as a form of culturally situated communication with implications for literary pedagogy and intercultural interpretation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

HUMOUR AS A STYLISTIC AND PRAGMATIC DEVICE IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LITERATURE. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(01), 1621-1624. https://doi.org/10.55640/

References

1.Austen, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Penguin Classics, 2003. – 432 p.

2.Jerome, Jerome K. Three Men in a Boat (To Say Nothing of the Dog). Oxford University Press, 2008. – 311 p.

3.Twain, Mark. The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. Harper & Brothers, 1876. – 274 p.

4.Qodiriy, Abdulla. Scorpion from the Altar. G‘afur G‘ulom Publishing House, 2018. – 356 p.

5.G‘ulom, Gafur. Shum bola. Yosh Gvardiya, 2015. – 182 p.

6.Qahhor, Abdulla. Selected Works. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2016. – 264 p.

7.Attardo, Salvatore. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Mouton de Gruyter, 1994. – 280 p.

8.Raskin, Victor. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Reidel, 1985. – 271 p.

9.Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics. Longman, 1983. – 310 p.

10.Crystal, David. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 522 p.

11.Chiaro, Delia. The Language of Jokes: Analysing Verbal Play. Routledge, 1992. – 240 p.

12.Morreall, John. Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. – 300 p.

13.Dynel, Marta. “Beyond a Joke: Types of Conversational Humour.” Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1284–1299, 2009. – 15 p.

14.Mustafoyeva, M. A. (2024). THE STUDY AND IMPORTANCE OF ANTHROPONYMS IN LINGUISTICS. Bulletin news in New Science Society International Scientific Journal, 1(5), 20-23.

15.Mustafoyeva, M. A. (2024). ANTHROPONYMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES AND THEIR LINGUOCULTURAL CLASSIFICATION. Bulletin news in New Science Society International Scientific Journal, 1(6), 146-150.

16.Mustafoeva, M. A. (2024). The Significance of Proper and Common Nouns in Linguistics. European journal of innovation in nonformal education (EJINE), 4(10).

17.Mustafoeva, M. A. (2022). The lexical layers of Uzbek anthroponyms. Fars international journal of education, social sciences and humanities, 10(12), 2022-6.

18.Mustafoeva, M. A. (2024). The importance of nouns in linguistics for learning language. European journal of innovation in nonformal education (EJINE), 4(9).

19.Mustafoeva, M. A. (2022). Ingliz tilidagi antroponimlarning rivojlanishining tarixiy taraqqiyot davri va leksik qatlami. Namangan Davlat Universiteti Ilmiy Axborotnomasi, 12, 2181-0427.

20.Askarovna, M. M. (2025). Modern Methods of Studying Anthroponyms in Linguistics and Their Significance. Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity, 38, 83-87.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.