MECHANISMS OF THE IMPACT OF DIGITALIZATION FACTORS ALONG THE SERVICES VALUE CHAIN AND THE ECONOMIC ESSENCE OF THE PLATFORMIZATION AND DATA-DRIVEN MANAGEMENT MODEL

Main Article Content

Usmonov Maxsud Tulqin ugli, Qodirov Farrux Ergash ugli

Abstract

 This article examines the mechanisms through which digitalization factors affect the service value chain (demand formation → service design → delivery → after-sales support) and clarifies the economic meaning of platformization and data-driven management. Using a conceptual-systems perspective, the study integrates service-dominant logic, the resource-based view, dynamic capabilities, transaction cost economics, and network effects theory. The paper explains how digital infrastructure, human capital, institutions, data governance, and platform capabilities reshape productivity, quality, personalization, innovation speed, and go-to-market costs across each stage of the service value chain. The Results section provides (i) an impact matrix linking digitalization factors to value chain stages, (ii) a profitability logic of platforms, and (iii) a KPI system for data-driven management—presented as tables—along with conceptual diagrams of the digital service transformation model and the platform ecosystem. The conclusion offers practical guidance for measuring and governing digital transformation in services and outlines future research directions. (Note: page numbers may vary by edition/format.)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MECHANISMS OF THE IMPACT OF DIGITALIZATION FACTORS ALONG THE SERVICES VALUE CHAIN AND THE ECONOMIC ESSENCE OF THE PLATFORMIZATION AND DATA-DRIVEN MANAGEMENT MODEL. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(02), 585-595. https://doi.org/10.55640/

References

1.Barney, Jay. 1991. “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.

2.Bharadwaj, Anandhi, Omar A. El Sawy, Paul A. Pavlou, and N. Venkatraman. 2013. “Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights.” MIS Quarterly 37(2): 471–482.

3.Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4(16): 386–405.

4.Davenport, Thomas H. 2006. “Competing on Analytics.” Harvard Business Review 84(1): 98–107.

5.Katz, Michael L., and Carl Shapiro. 1985. “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility.” American Economic Review 75(3): 424–440.

6.Parker, Geoffrey G., Marshall W. Van Alstyne, and Sangeet Paul Choudary. 2016. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy. New York: W. W. Norton.

7.Provost, Foster, and Tom Fawcett. 2013. Data Science for Business. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

8.Rochet, Jean-Charles, and Jean Tirole. 2003. “Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1(4): 990–1029.

9.Teece, David J. 2007. “Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 28(13): 1319–1350.

10.Vargo, Stephen L., and Robert F. Lusch. 2004. “Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing.” Journal of Marketing 68(1): 1–17.

11.Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.

12.Yoo, Youngjin, Ola Henfridsson, and Kalle Lyytinen. 2012. “The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation.” Information Systems Research 23(4): 1398–1408.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.