THE ROLE OF THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY IN ENSURING THE LEGALITY, VALIDITY, AND FAIRNESS OF THE COURT DECISION
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article is devoted to the analysis of the role and significance of the revision instance in the practice of criminal proceedings in courts. It thoroughly examines the function of the revision procedure in ensuring that a court decision (judgment, ruling, decree) is not only legal, but also justified (fact-based) and fair (proportionality of punishment).
The powers and practical mechanisms of the supervisory authority in correcting judicial errors, eliminating procedural violations, and monitoring the correctness of proof will be indicated. Also, its place in the system of higher judicial control, current problems, and ways to increase its effectiveness are scientifically and practically substantiated. The article highlights the fundamental importance of the revision procedure in strengthening criminal procedural guarantees within the framework of judicial and legal reforms.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1. Rakhimova M. M. THE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF ATTORNEY PARTICIPATION IN THE HIGHER INSTANCE OF CRIMINAL COURTS //Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences. - 2022. - Vol. 2. - No. 5. - P. 714-721.
2. Vokhobjonovich M.Z. COMPLIANCE WITH PROCEDURAL NORMS BY COURTS IN THE PROCESS OF DISCUSSION OF CRIMINAL CASES AT THE FIRST INSTANCE STAGE //Eurasian Journal of Academic Research. - 2021. - Vol. 4. - No. 3-1. - P. 144-147.
3. Alishaev S. Issues of improving the procedure for preparing a criminal case for judicial review //Society and Innovation. - 2021. - Vol. 4. - No. 7/S. - P. 101-106.
4. Kholov U. SOME ISSUES OF REVIEWING LEGALLY ENTERED COURT DOCUMENTS BASED ON NEWLY DISCOVERED CIRCUMSTANCES //Actual problems of social sciences and humanities. - 2021. - Vol. 5. - No. 3. - P. 395-399.
5. Irisdavlatovich A. R. GENERAL PROVISIONS DEFINING THE POWERS OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE CONSIDERATION OF CASES IN COURTS // PROSPECTS AND MAIN TRENDS IN MODERN SCIENCE. - 2021. - Vol. 2. - No. 15. - P. 69-72.
6. Farhad, F. (2025). CONSTITUTION - GUARANTEE OF HUMAN RIGHTS. MODELS AND METHODS FOR INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH, 4 (44), 392-395.
7. Ilyas ugli, A. A. (2022). PROCEDURAL PROCEDURE FOR THE EXAMINATION OF EVIDENCE BY THE COURTS BY DIRECT AND ORAL METHODS.
8. Ozodovich S. A., Ibragimova M. A. THE IMPORTANCE OF REVIEWING COURT SENTENCES AND DECISIONS //Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences. - 2021. - Vol. 1. - No. 3. - P. 616-618.
9. Komolov, Dilshod. "A LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF THE FORMATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN." TAMADUN NURI JOURNAL 1.64 (2025): 43-46.
10. Bermakhanova A. K. POWERS OF THE COURT OF CASSATION IN CONSIDERATION OF A CRIMINAL CASE //Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences. - 2022. - Vol. 2. - No. 3. - P. 1059-1065.