THE IMPACT OF INTERACTIVE DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LISTENING AND SPEAKING COMPETENCE IN ESL EDUCATION
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article investigates the impact of interactive digital technologies on the development of listening and speaking competence in ESL education. In the context of rapid technological innovation and increasing digitalization of language learning environments, interactive tools such as multimedia platforms, virtual communication systems, speech recognition software, and mobile applications have become integral components of modern ESL instruction. The study examines how these technologies facilitate authentic language exposure, promote active learner engagement, and enhance oral communication skills. From the author’s perspective, interactive digital technologies contribute significantly to improving learners’ listening comprehension and spoken fluency by providing multimodal input, immediate feedback, and opportunities for meaningful interaction. Unlike traditional instructional approaches that often limit communicative practice, interactive tools create dynamic environments that simulate real-life communication contexts. The article analyzes both theoretical foundations and practical classroom applications to demonstrate how technology-enhanced interaction strengthens communicative competence, learner autonomy, and confidence. The findings suggest that when implemented systematically and aligned with pedagogical objectives, interactive digital technologies have a measurable positive impact on the development of listening and speaking competence in ESL learners. The study underscores the importance of strategic integration of technology to maximize educational effectiveness and sustainable language development.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Beatty, K. (2010). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
2.Blake, R. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning (2nd ed.). Georgetown University Press.
3.Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge University Press.
4.Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Using mobile technology to develop language skills and cultural understanding. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 1–17.
5.Hubbard, P. (2009). Computer assisted language learning: Critical concepts in linguistics. Routledge.
6.Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289.
7.Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
9.Stockwell, G. (2013). Technology and motivation in English-language teaching and learning. In E. Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation (pp. 156–175). Palgrave Macmillan.
10.Traxler, J. (2018). Learning with mobiles in developing countries: Technology, language, and literacy. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 10(2), 1–15.
11.Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge University Press.
12.Zhang, D. (2016). Multimedia input and listening comprehension: The impact of video support on ESL learners. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 176–187.