IMPROVING EARLY DETECTION AND PREVENTION OF DISTAL PRICUS IN CHILDREN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
distal occlusion, early diagnosis, short-term observation, morphofunctional markers, pediatric orthodontics, clinical assessment.Abstract
This study is aimed at improving the early diagnostic capabilities for detecting distal occlusion in children at the preclinical stage of its development. The objective was to identify early morphological and functional markers indicating susceptibility to distal occlusion under short-term clinical observation and to assess their diagnostic significance. A prospective clinical observation was conducted in children aged 5–8 years over a period of 3–4 months. The sagittal position of primary canines, inclination of lower incisors, stability of lip closure, mandibular resting position, and relative facial profile parameters were evaluated in a comprehensive manner. Statistical analysis demonstrated that several micro-changes showed consistent reproducibility even within a short observation period. Minimal distal displacement of primary canines, early inclination changes of lower incisors, and decreased stability of lip closure were identified as clinically significant indicators of susceptibility to distal occlusion development (p < 0.05). Combined assessment of these markers enables identification of risk groups prior to the clinical manifestation of occlusal deformity. The scientific novelty of the study lies in substantiating the feasibility of detecting initial morphofunctional alterations associated with distal occlusion within a short-term observation period, as well as in developing practical early diagnostic criteria applicable in routine dental practice.
Downloads
References
1.Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2013.
2.Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1975;68(5):554–563.
3.Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Progress in Orthodontics. 2015;16:38.
4.Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2009;135(1):27–35.
5.Sheridan JJ. Air‑rotor stripping. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 1985;19(2):43–59.
6.Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics: treatment planning principles regarding extractions. In: Proffit WR, ed. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2013.
7.Zachrisson BU. Managing alignment of crowded anterior teeth. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;131(4):531–540.
8.McNamara JA Jr. Maxillary transverse deficiency. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2000;117(5):567–70.
9.Creton D, Patel M, Suri S. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: State of the art. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2015;18 Suppl 1:54–66.
10.Little RM, Riedel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1988;94(5):404–413.
11.Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Evaluation of clear aligner therapy in adults: a systematic review. Progress in Orthodontics. 2014;15:2.
12.Thiruvenkatachari B, et al. Stability of orthodontic space closure: a systematic review. Journal of Orthodontics. 2015;42(2):101–109.
13.Littlewood SJ, et al. Retention and relapse in clinical practice. British Dental Journal. 2019;226(11):845–851.
14.Rossini G, et al. Clinical performance of clear aligners: a systematic review. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2016;19(2):79–86.
15.Агапов С.В. Клиническая ортодонтия: руководство для врачей. Москва: Медицина; 2018. (на русском языке)
16.Иванова Е.А. Оценка эффективности коррекции скученности зубных рядов у подростков. Автореферат диссертации, РУДН; 2019. (на русском языке)
17.Герасимова А.В. Применение элайнеров при лечении скученности: клинические наблюдения. Стоматология. 2021;12(3):45–52. (на русском языке)
18.Sabirov GSh. Clinical outcomes of aligner therapy in Uzbekistan population. Journal of Regional Dentistry. 2022;5(1):22–30. (на русском языке)
19.Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics: Stability and relapse. Elsevier; 2013.
20.Ueno H, et al. Long‑term stability of orthodontic treatment: systematic review. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2012;34(4):439–448.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India