THE SPEECH IMPACT OF POLYSEMY IN ENGLISH COMMUNICATION
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article investigates the role of polysemy in shaping effective English communication. The study examines how multiple related meanings of a single lexical unit influence speech comprehension, interpretation speed, and communicative success in both native and non-native interactions. Drawing on semantic, cognitive, and pragmatic perspectives, the research analyzes conversational patterns and discourse contexts to determine how speakers select and interpret meanings in real time. The findings indicate that polysemy enhances communicative economy by allowing speakers to express complex concepts using a limited vocabulary set, while successful interpretation depends primarily on contextual alignment and pragmatic inference. Advanced users process polysemous words predictively through conceptual schemas, whereas developing learners rely on primary meanings and therefore experience delays or misunderstandings. The study also demonstrates that polysemy functions as a rhetorical tool in professional and media discourse and requires additional contextual support in digital communication. Overall, the research concludes that communicative competence in English depends not only on vocabulary size but on the ability to manage semantic flexibility and contextual interpretation.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.
2.Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
3.Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.
4.Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
5.Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197692
6.Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan.
7.Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
8.Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(6), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90355-4