THE ROLE OF THE LINGUOCULTURAL APPROACH IN DEVELOPING MEDICAL-TECHNICAL THINKING AMONG MEDICAL STUDENTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
When medical terms and metaphorical units are analyzed from the perspective of cross-cultural differences, students gain a deeper understanding of the semantic and associative layers of terminological systems. The research examines the effectiveness of studying medical terminology through cultural semantic networks, analyzing pragmatic units in medical discourse (such as discourse markers, modality indicators, euphemisms), and applying interactive methods—role plays, case studies, and simulation classes. These methods help shape students as culturally sensitive specialists who can communicate confidently in medical settings while maintaining a balanced understanding of language and culture.
The findings show that the linguocultural approach serves as an effective didactic model integrating cognitive, communicative, and cultural competencies in medical education. It teaches students not only medical terminology but also prepares them to understand cultural diversity in the global healthcare environment. As a result, students develop a harmonious blend of medical-technical reasoning, empathy, and intercultural communication skills.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold Publishers.
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after Twenty Years: A Re-Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.
Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining Issues in English for Specific Purposes. Oxford University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, L., Wareing, S., Singh, I., Stilwell Peccei, J., Thornborrow, J., & Jones, J. (2004). Language, Society and Power: An Introduction. Routledge.
Uzbekistan Ministry of Higher Education. (2023). ESP Curriculum for Medical Universities. Tashkent: Ministry of Higher Education Press.
Seidlhofer, B. (2005). English as a Lingua Franca. ELT Journal, 59(4), 339–341. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci064
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.