MODERN MILITARY TERMINOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACHES: AN INTEGRATED ANALYSIS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This comprehensive study examines the dynamic interplay between evolving military terminology and contemporary psychological approaches in modern warfare. Through a mixed-methods approach analyzing doctrinal documents, operational reports, and psychological literature from 2015-2023, this research identifies significant paradigm shifts in military discourse. The 6,666-word article structured according to IMRAD guidelines demonstrates how technological advancements, asymmetric conflicts, and information warfare have generated new lexical frameworks that increasingly incorporate psychological concepts. Key findings reveal the normalization of psychological operations terminology, the emergence of "cognitive warfare" as a distinct domain, and the lexicalization of soldier mental states like "moral injury." The study concludes that modern military terminology reflects a fundamental transformation from kinetic-centered to cognition-centered warfare, with important implications for military training, international cooperation, and veteran support systems.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1. Department of Defense (2022). Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. Joint Publication 1-02. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
3. Friedman, B. H. (2020). The Language of Deterrence: Terminology in Nuclear and Conventional Strategy. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 14(4), 56-78.
4. Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
5. Karimova, S. (2022). Uzbek Military Lexicon: Adaptation to Global Terminology. Tashkent: National Defense University Publications.
6. Kuznetsov, A. V. (2020). Russian Military Terminology in the Information Age. Moscow: Defense Language Institute Press.
7. NATO Standardization Office (2023). NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions (AAP-06). Brussels: NATO Headquarters.
8. O'Malley, P. D. (2023). Moral Injury and Military Ethics: Terminology and Treatment Approaches. Ethics & International Affairs, 37(2), 211-229.
9. Petrov, I. V. (2022). Psychological Resilience in Modern Military Operations. Military Psychology Review, 18(4), 332-350.
10.https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai/article/view/5011