THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The widespread integration of social networks has significantly transformed both the theory and practice of language learning. This study investigates the influence of major platforms such as Facebook and YouTube by combining an extensive review of prior research with survey and interview data from language learners. The analysis demonstrates that these platforms can enhance vocabulary, grammar development, and intercultural awareness, yet they also introduce challenges related to non-standard language use and digital distraction. Overall, the findings indicate that while social networks provide valuable authentic input and interaction, their effectiveness depends on careful incorporation into structured language instruction and informed pedagogical practice.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Adami, E. (2009) ‘We/YouTube: Exploring multimodal participation in video interaction’, in Page, M. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 197–208.
2.Blattner, G. and Fiori, M. (2009) ‘Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities’, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1), pp. 17–28.
3.Bou-Franch, P., Lorenzo-Dus, N. and Blitvich, P.G.C. (2012) ‘Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(4), pp. 501–521.
4.Boyd, D. (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
5.Chenzi, Q., Xin, L. and Chen, L. (2012) ‘Integrating Facebook and social networking tools in ESL writing instruction’, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(5), pp. 874–883.
6.Clark, C. (2010) ‘Integrating technology into language teaching in Australia: Teacher perspectives and pedagogical challenges’, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(2), pp. 147–161.
7.Herring, S.C. (1999) ‘Interactional coherence in CMC’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4).
8.Herring, S.C. (2013) ‘Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent’, in Tannen, D. and Tester, A.M. (eds.) Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 1–25.
9.Jenks, C. (2014) Social Interaction in Second Language Chat Rooms. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
10.Lamy, M.-N. and Hampel, R. (2007) Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
11.Marcoccia, M. (2004) ‘On-line polylogues: Conversation structure and participation framework in internet newsgroups’, Journal of Pragmatics, 36(1), pp. 115–145.
12.Paolillo, J. (2011) ‘Managing participation in internet newsgroups’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(3), pp. 301–326.
13.Sindoni, M.G. (2013) Spoken and Written Discourse in Online Interactions: A Multimodal Approach. London: Routledge.
14.Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.Thorne, S.L. (2010) ‘The “intercultural turn” and language learning in the digital age’, Language Teaching, 43(4), pp. 365–380.
16.Warschauer, M. (2010) ‘Inviting change: Educators, technology, and language learning’, Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), pp. 8–14.