ASSESSMENT OF COGNITIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES IN INFORMATICS EDUCATION BASED ON AI-INTEGRATED INTERACTIVE LEARNING COMPLEXES: A BLOOM’S TAXONOMY APPROACH

Authors

  • Nabiev Feruz Abdumannonovich, Mamanazarov Bakhrom Jumonovich, Nurilloeva Dilsuz Shodmonovna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

artificial intelligence in education, interactive learning complexes, Bloom’s taxonomy, cognitive learning outcomes, informatics education, adaptive learning systems, digital pedagogy, educational technology

Abstract

 The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and digital transformation in education has significantly increased the demand for innovative interactive learning environments. In this context, the development and effective implementation of AI-integrated interactive learning complexes require a scientifically grounded pedagogical and methodological framework. This study aims to assess cognitive learning outcomes in informatics education through the application of AI-supported interactive learning complexes based on Bloom’s taxonomy.

The research examines the pedagogical potential of interactive digital modules, adaptive learning systems, intelligent tutoring platforms, virtual laboratories, and automated assessment tools in enhancing students’ cognitive development. A comprehensive instructional model grounded in Bloom’s taxonomy is proposed to evaluate students’ learning outcomes across six cognitive levels: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. The study employs experimental and analytical methods, including pedagogical observation, diagnostic testing, and statistical data analysis.

The findings demonstrate that systematic integration of artificial intelligence into interactive learning complexes significantly enhances students’ engagement, promotes individualized learning trajectories, and improves cognitive achievement in informatics education. The results confirm that the proposed pedagogical framework contributes to the development of critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and higher-order cognitive competencies. This study provides methodological guidelines for educators and institutions seeking to implement sustainable, adaptive, and learner-centered digital education practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

2.Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company.

3.Aziz, G., Kapenda, B. K., Badibanga, Y., Ibangu, K. A., & Tulanda, L. (2025). Bloom’s taxonomy revisited in the age of Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Studies, 4(6), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.63883/ijsrisjournal.v4i6.516

4.Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., Cwiertny, D., & Demir, I. (2023). Integrating AI and learning analytics for data-driven pedagogical decisions and personalized interventions in education. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09548

5.Yaacoub, A., DaRugna, J., & Assaghir, Z. (2025). Assessing AIgenerated questions’ alignment with cognitive frameworks in educational assessment. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14232

6.Yaacoub, A., Tarnpradab, S., Khumprom, P., Assaghir, Z., Prevost, L., & DaRugna, J. (2025). Enhancing AIdriven education: Integrating cognitive frameworks, linguistic feedback analysis, and ethical considerations. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00339

7.Heung Yue Yim, I., & Su, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence learning tools in K12 education: A scoping review. Journal of Computers in Education, 12, 93–131.

8.Reimagining instructional design: ChatGPT, Bloom’s taxonomy, and the role of teacher expertise (2025). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102325

9.Yuldashev, S. (2024). Integration of modern web technologies into higher education processes. Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences.

10.Xatamkulov, M., & Xasanova, M. (2024). The effectiveness of implementing innovative electronic learning resources in educational management systems. Qo‘qon Universiteti Xabarnomasi, 13, 242–246. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v13i.1066

11.Barakayeva, H. C. (2022). Using cloud technologies in the development of digital learning resources. Digital Transformation and Artificial Intelligence.

12.Zarqarayeva, N. S., Zaripbayeva, S. A., & Mamatkulova, F. A. (2022). Educational technologies and their impact on teaching and learning processes. O‘zbekiston Davlat Jahon Tillari Universiteti Conference Proceedings.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

ASSESSMENT OF COGNITIVE LEARNING OUTCOMES IN INFORMATICS EDUCATION BASED ON AI-INTEGRATED INTERACTIVE LEARNING COMPLEXES: A BLOOM’S TAXONOMY APPROACH. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(02), 2317-2322. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 2705

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.